Tuesday, 7 March 2017

Observations: Panama Case 2017 Pakistan

Pakistan’s Panama Case 2017 :  My Observations 
                                                By Nilofer Afridi Qazi


Attending the #Panama Case at the Supreme Court of Pakistan- a case of alleged corruption by Pakistan’s Prime Minister’s family, was an eye-opening experience. I had never been to a Pakistani Court hearing before.  I diligently went every morning to attend the daily sessions, until the Justices thought it was time to deliberate a finding. In total, there were 126 days of #panama hearings. The whole nation was hooked and waited with bated breath for the outcome (like a long drawn out cricket match!). This was like a soap opera, starring the  Sharif family and their massive wealth generated over four decades, with the help of Gulf Arab countries.

Lets say this case is probably one of Pakistan’s most important judicial cases. As an observer, a citizen,  I think it would be interesting for some observations to be noted.

First, it was practically impossible to attend the court sessions if one was not well ‘connected’, in spite of the fact that the supreme court is a public forum. This case was ‘special.  The Panama case attracted local media reporters and some ‘anchors’ through the 126 days. There was the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz team, members of Parliament, Senate, cabinet and friends flown in from London. The Pakistan Tehrik Insaf team were led by Imran Khan along with Jehangir Tarin,  who sat next to him. Shah Mehmud Qureshi, Asad Umar (always sitting at the back); Shirin Mazari with her loyal companion Munaza Hasan also came regularly.  I have to say, Shirin Apa is a force to reckon with.

Every morning, there was a battle of getting your name on the ‘List’, to get into the Court, then pass through three various checking points.  We would line outside Court Room 2 where the door would open at 9am sharp. Shirin Apa would observe that government officials would send their ‘sitters’ through an alternative door before 9am to occupy the first come first serve small courtroom’s prized seats. This was unfair to those who were not allowed to enter before 9am. This battle of nerves of addressing rule violations was a daily observation.

Interestingly, there was a tacit understanding no one sat next to Imran Khan, unless it was Jehangir Tareen.  His party people sat on the same line as him nearby or behind. The rest of us had to battle for the remaining 60 seats.

The PMLN legal team always came well before time. Tons of books carried in suticases arrived everyday. All the lawyers took notes and paid very close attention to every observation. Salman Akram Raja represented the sons of the Prime Minister;  Shahid Hamid ( and his very able daughter Ayesha Hamid as his assistant) represented  the Prime Minister’s daughter Mariam Sharif Safdar and her husband & The Finance Minister Isaq Dar while Prime Minister was represented by Makhdum Khan.  The defense team was professional and well prepared.  There was no tamasha no hangers on, a few lawyers who were not officially on the team were seen, eg Faisal Naqvi otherwise it was a tight team.

In contrast, the plaintiff’s table was empty: no books and no visible means of note taking. Glaringly invisible, the lead counsel, Naeem Bukhari, was absent for a large part and would not come before the court was in session.


One wondered how Imran Khan chose his legal team. The responses I got reflected that no one wanted to defend this case because it was thought to be an open shut case in favour of the sitting government. Secondly, apparently Imran Khan was not willing to pay for a professional lawyer?

I had not sat through those sessions in 2016. However, the 2017 Bench: Justice Asif Saeed Khosa  who led the bench, Justice Ejaz Afzal, Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Justice Sheikh Azmat Saeed and Justice Ijazul Ahsan  made for a very interesting group. Justice Khosa was a determined judge who wanted a concrete resolution from this hearing. His wry sense of humour kept one glued to the goings on and focused. I was pleasantly surprised to see such competence as I had little expectations.

Justice Azmat Saeed was by far the most loquacious.  He summarized the observations of the Sharifs when they hit upon a snag. The man is a very  bright judge who had the ability to simplify scenarios in a way that the layman could understand them too. He has a political mind no doubt.

Justice Afzal the most ‘Punjabi’ of the bench was more of a listener and observer of his surroundings.  During closure he surprised EVERYONE by being the most forceful in stating the respondents ‘narrative was unbelievable’ and asked if the Prime Minister was trying to challenge the intelligence of the court with these tales of spin.

Justice Gulzar, the ‘Urdu speaking judge’ was the least verbose on the bench.  For example, he did not articulate his thoughts publicly and repeated a few questions that followed the bench’s line of inquiry.

Justice Ahsan looked the youngest on the bench. His youthful look belied his knowledge and style of questioning.  Every single time he spoke, it was clear that he had read every line of the submissions. For instance, he  red marked clear inconsistencies and ‘clerical errors’.

The leader of this Bench was clearly Justice Khosa, and his ability to put questions to both sides with professional authority. His command over the Bench, the details of the case, the holes in the legal arguments and the implications on Pakistan’s political legal moral fabric was very evident. He referred to law and Justice and the court responsibility as guardians of Pakistan’s constitution and their responsibilities.

I have to admit witnessing this case was historical.  Being there, watching the court dynamics and interactions was a lesson in law, public relations, and Pakistani culture altogether.

The daily hearings had many legal observations and arguments which I tweeted from @ninoqazi. You can read more on that space about the process and outcome of the case. Will the flood gates of accountability of the most powerful finally see the light of day or will it be an open and shut case most dejectedly have predicted?  We shall see and I shall follow all of it judiciously. I have faith in the five judges is all I’ll say.




Thursday, 1 September 2016

Pakistan on a Plate is a series of programs capturing the undocumented culinary wonders of Pakistani cuisine. I hope I am able to find partners and supporters who see the value of this endeavour. Almost all societies have documented and celebrated and shared their culinary traditions, in Pakistan we have not. What we have in our public spaces, whether on TV, cookbooks or restaurants/dhabbas are so limited and certainly does not showcase the vast varied and wonderful recipes of what is Pakistani food. it takes time, research,effort, support, interest and access.

Accessing these spaces and recipes are not easy, but I am a foodie and I am curious enough and persistent enough to coax those who are shy, culturally hesitant to share & showcase their food traditions. from their perspectives and from their own spaces. it is important to experience it unfiltered. authentic!

Archiving and recording is essential in any given society. Pakistan on a Plate is one such venture and adventure. Wish me luck and hopefully together we can explore and enjoy Pakistan's culinary adventures! 
https://vimeo.com/home/myvideos  promo for English Pakistan on a Plate
https://vimeo.com/home/myvideos Pakistan on a Plate : Promo for Kachnaar Episode

Tuesday, 19 July 2016

ArmChair Warrior

Armchair Warriors


This term stings because It ring of truth. Then again, where does one go if one wants to get up from the chair or keyboard and go do something to make things better in Pakistan?

Lets look at our options, or at least how I see them. Political parties would be the natural first stop. Pick a party that professes ideals and actions that will make Pakistan a saner, safer space for all its citizens. Enough! of  7th century rhetoric and justifications for cruelty and lack of humanity. We live in the 21st century and our social, legal and political norms need to reflect what is necessary to succeed in today’s world.

I’ll begin with what some call our ‘liberal’ political parties: the PPP and ANP supposedly, as there are no credible examples (at least in recent memory) to justify their so called liberal credentials.
The former is responsible for the break up of East Pakistan. That’s not all. Also, bringing religion into the constitution and society, banning a community, and keeping an entire province in a slave like situation of socio-economic development, while the party’s leaders and their off springs lead a life of luxury abroad.
Liberal value for oneself and one’s tribe has to translate into policies within your own political party and the province you govern as well. Sindh land management system, human development indicators do not reflect anything but the extractive nature of the PPP.  Just look at their assets in Dubai and London How come Larkana and Nawabshah are a far cry from Dubai, Singapore or London? (leaders favorite to go to spots).
This is not even looking at what they did to Baluchistan, initiating a civil war on one’s own people! So PPP,  I am not buying the cool aide of Bhutto Zardari.

Then we have the ANP, which is the only secular party (pre partition) in Pakistan. I would have loved to see this political party grow to its logical potential. In a pre modern society, bringing education to people is no easy task. It becomes even more challenging when multiple military coups and constant and persistent interference by the armed forces in KPK has barred the ANP’s development. Still, there is still no excuse for its leadership to become financially corrupt which then becomes the leverage the powers that be have over them to make them work on their terms.  For example, the handing over of SWAT to the Taliban as an experiment of appeasement. A province which has had so much war and violence as result of proxy wars, assets on your doorsteps, and non state actors active publicly. Then why would politicians agree to more militarization through POPA? Sadly no ANP either.

PTI? I have to admit it breaks my heart literally when I type this.  I had so much hope in their goal towards “tabdeeli” (change).  I painted my face draped the flag and was excited as a teenager. Sounds moronic but excitement and hope make us children again.  I am not naïve, but the party has shattered so much hope amongst those willing to fight for change. Alas, it feels they’ve choosen the exact same type of people to lead the march for change? Does that make sense? Ofcourse not, hence no change in political style, issues of concern to the people of Pakistan or roadmap for a saner safer Pakistan.  A dead end.  Sooner or later, all civilian parties reach this wall due to lack of commitment to their goals and internal strife.

There were signs from the start that Imran khan may not really be the person to initiate a change necessary for Pakistan to arrive in the 21st century but beggars cannot be choosers.
But when donors had to convince him that education ministry in KP could not be given to JI partner, that is what convinced him, rather than our voices, I became concerned.  When Imran Khan gave up Peshawar NA1 seat for Rawalpindi’s seat, my pre modern DNA realized he’s not one of us. As usual, he has revealed his true colours in action rather than in his rhetoric. How can a leader reject the capital seat and think you can run a government there with respect? How could Imran Khan think he could convince the electorate he cares when he rejected them directly? Only someone who isn’t thinking in terms of electoral politics as it is-connecting directly with each citizen as your source of power. Heart break continues with him always on the wrong side of social issues.

PMLN? I could never consider them as an option. Why? Frankly as a woman, non Punjabi and liberal secular there is absolutely no space for folks like me. Of course there are some decent and educated people in the Pmln, but most remain silent or silenced to make way for a number of opportunists. Im not interested in a monarchical political environment and pmln works like that. Not for me.

As a Pakistani, I am very proud that my family was part of the freedom movement which led to the creation of this beautiful country. But their vision was freedom from oppression, a better life for all citizens irrespective of creed or gender- not majoritarianism. Today’s Pmln is not a reflection of this ideology, and become myopic: since it is rooted in Punjab Punjab/Kashmir identity. The party has no idea about inclusion nor does it pretend to just look at its budget allocations.

Social media has  recently started to show the level of disgust people feel towards corrupt leaders. One such example is of a Pakistani immigrant in the UK walking up to the current PM and his son outside a high end shopping center and telling them what corrupt leaders they are and how they’ve bled the people of their rights. While the masses have been complaining about leadership for many years, people’s voices are finally being heard with so much information available in so many forms.

My Pakistan is based on Jinnah’s idea and those who supported the idea of a safe haven from majority rule. That is my understanding of my homeland.
So where do I go as a citizen to advocate for this idea of Pakistan?

As a democrat I do not support the military in political roles.  There does not lie much hope in the civilian parties and their actions. This never ending cycle of futility begs the question, where do we go from here?

Civil society? A healthy country usually is reflected by its state of civil society. We aren’t healthy. Wealthy yes by donor funding which has sucked the oxygen of  the minds of those who could lead or contribute towards political social activity to lobby for change.

Is this an adequate excuse or explanation? I don’t know. But there has to be some reason we don’t come out when hundreds of children are murdered, women are killed for pre modern notions of honour or governors are murdered in broad day light or suicide bombers attack mosques parks and cantonments. The media becomes the selective vehicle of outrage. From a safe distance. Why? I want to scream!

Screaming can be healthy or destructive. Currently I am in limbo. Where do I channel this anger this desire for change? You tell me.



Monday, 3 August 2015

2 degrees to much

http://pakteahouse.net/2015/07/31/nilofers-corner-2-degrees-too-much/


I don’t really understand what the climate change debate is all about. I thought, let me speak to a friend who does and explain it to me simply. There is a United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), which 194 countries have signed. Pakistan is one of them. There have been several summits where scientists and politicians have come together and discussed what climate change is about, what is causing it (human activities) and what countries can do to mitigate it. The UNFCCC was opened for signature at the Earth Summit held in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 and came into force in 1994.
After several years of negotiations it was decided that a treaty would be signed in Copenhagen in 2009; however that did not happen and the world gave itself a new deadline (2015) to come up with some kind of a consensus on what they would agree on to make the world safer by curbing green house emissions (which causes global warming). There had been no consensus in Copenhagen, but what everyone did agree on was that the world will not exceed an increase of 2 degrees Celsius in temperature (since the industrial revolution occurred). The world has already warmed around 1 degree so clearly the clock is ticking as scientists say that if we exceed the 2 degrees limit, we are headed towards “catastrophe”.
Climate change is today a reality; as Arnold Schwarzenegar recently put it, “it is NOT science fiction”. The tricky part is to agree on how to reduce temperature globally. The deadline to reach a consensus has now arrived and this year in November in Paris 2015 all the worlds’ leaders will meet to come up with a legally binding treaty to limit global warming. In recent years, the world has seen population exponentially increase, witnessed massive natural disasters, and at the same time added massive industrial and agricultural pollutants into our atmosphere. Extreme weather events such as violent storms, flooding, droughts and wildfires have all happened with only 1 degree of temperature increase; imagine what would happen at 2 degrees!
What will be the world’s commitments in Paris? And what will be Pakistan’s commitments? Thus far India has already stated it will not accept any cap on coal use. China has accepted coal caps. We will only find out about Pakistan’s commitments in August/September, a few months before the scheduled November Paris meeting.
Some basics about what contributes to the increase in global temperatures which in turn starts the cycle of death on Earth.
There are 4/5 ‘tipping points’ events, which scientists warn that if they occur on a large scale, their damage will be irreversible:
1) Methane emissions from Antarctica melting
2) Greenland ice sheet melting to disappearance levels
3) The gulf stream affected by warming (this keeps UK, Europe temperature moderate)
4) Amazon Forest dying out
5) Disruption to the Indian and west African monsoon
6) Loss of Perma Frost: in Siberia & Tundra (north Canada) a layer of ice that keeps the methane in the soil frozen.
When the Artic ice melts methane gas is emitted, methane is a green house gas, which also contributes to global warming along with carbon dioxide emissions. Ice deflects heat, but when the ice caps melt and expose the darker sea below, the warming is absorbed by the oceans, which then results in even more warming and ice melting.
What contributes to temperature rising
1. All industrialization activity results in some form of greenhouse gas emissions, which have led to an increase in temperatures as the emissions are trapped by the atmosphere and heat up the planet. Coal power plants particularly are the most polluting, cement factories are another and car emissions also add to polluting emissions.
2. Deforestation also contributes towards green house gas emissions; trees are ‘carbon sinks’ they store carbon dioxide and when you cut trees down and burn or process the wood, green house gas emissions increase in our atmosphere.
3. Agricultural process also contributes, to a lesser extent, towards global warming. Livestock and rice paddies produce methane gas.
What is Pakistan doing to reduce global warming and the resultant negative impact on our population and quality of life? We will shortly know when the Government of Pakistan releases their list of commitments for the Paris meeting in November. One hopes that the Government of Pakistan has adequate expertise on this critical matter.
A list of countries, which contribute towards global warming:
Green house

Monday, 27 July 2015

Judicial Commissions Findings do not imply that the 2013 Elections were 'Fair'

http://pakteahouse.net/2015/07/23/nilofers-corner-judicial-commissions-findings-do-not-imply-that-2013-elections-were-fair/

mran Khan accused the electoral managers of ‘rigging’ the election of 2013. It has been over two years since these accusations were made; a protest that lasted 4 months and nearly brought the sitting Government to a standstill resulted in little change, attention or review of Pakistan’s electoral system. Many who support PTI have also observed Imran Khan’s statements claiming irrefutable proof of pre-mediated irregularities & fixing that have been shared with the appropriate authorities. Where is all that evidence?
PTI supporters have also seen a campaign of maligning individuals, institutions and processes that raised many questions about the fairness of office bearers and neutrality of institutions overseeing electoral management processes without any results. Many of what Imran Khan claimed to be ‘facts’ have come into question now and some proven to be inaccurate where both he and his party officials have had to recant and apologize. All of this is on the record and better people have discussed and analyzed these details in much more sophisticated minutia.
My disappointment in Imran Khan aside, what the Judicial Commission’s report, yet to be formally released, states seems to be there was no systematic rigging by the care taker government in favour of the current majority party in power, this also problematic. I cannot pass judgement on evidence provided at the JC since I was not privy to the sessions but I was an active participant of elections 2013. What worries me and observing social media’s reactions and other discussion group forums worries me tremendously. Too many are using this Judgement to continue the current ‘do nothing policy’ on electoral reforms.
Pakistan is a very fragile democracy. The election commission is undermined by political interference, its office bearers do not have the capacity to ensure systems to oversee independent monitoring officers during any elections; the equipment to ensure human error is unavailable and excuses after excuses are made to avoid biometrics for elections. The use of government employees beholden to caretaker officials who in turn are appointment by electoral candidates cannot possibly be the appropriate system for a free fair electoral system. There is no trust in our institutions and institutional managers and hence some kind of trustworthy systems needs to be put in place. Cary on business as usual only serves those who benefit from the current dysfunctional system.
Analysts and political opponents now on the war path against the foolishness of many of Imran Khan’s Statements whether on the TTP or Taliban Office or 35 punctures, will focus on these,& use his lack of growing credibility as the basis to undermine the very very important matter of electoral reform. Credit has to be given to Imran Khan, he is the only political leader and party that persistently highlighted the need for a better electoral system in Pakistan.
Imran biggest challenge is himself.
Imran khan critics need to remember before they begin their gloat fest Yes Imran has many flaws. But bringing up fundamental flaw in our democratic process is certainly not one of them. He may not have proven his case in the court of law or in the judicial commission but to suggest that our elections were ‘ok’ and ‘lets move on’ is just as criminal and intellectually dishonest.

Chitral Floods Shows how ill prepared we are for Disasters

http://pakteahouse.net/2015/07/24/nilofers-corner-chitral-floods-show-how-ill-prepared-we-are-for-disasters/


Once again the rainy season is upon us & once again government of Pakistan is not prepared. No one ever is. It happens every year, disasters of various magnitudes happen, people get hurt, displaced and even lose their lives but no is ever prepared. Not since 2005, 2010 government does not consider disaster management an important enough ‘activity’. Yes we do have a federal national disaster management authority and provincial disaster management authorities and as I recall UNDP has spent several packets multiple times in training district level disaster management ‘authorities’ as well.
It is not as if we haven’t had practice of disasters across the country of the natural kind the man made variety and everything in between; but for some unexplainable reason government of Pakistan ALWAYS requires the army to step in for relief activities, donors to provide some sort of early recovery and civil society to chip in for relief through rehabilitation. No investment in mitigation or preparedness. None. Life is cheap.
Lets look at Chitral from what little I understand Bridges at Osiak, Kosht, Shogore have been washed away; in Upper Chitral, in the Kalash valleys and Garam Chashma valley have been totally cut off with the main roads washed away. The Drinking water supply to Chitral town has been disrupted. The Electricity on the main systems has been totally disrupted. Flood waters are flowing through central Boomboret; hundreds of irrigation channel heads have been destroyed which has resulted in thousands of people will have to work for days to restore them through self help. Where is government in all this? When it comes to obstruction, NOC, documentation etc. government is all over us. But when it comes to basic civic management their raison d’etre they are unprepared. Chitral is a mountainous area with weak road communication systems, these are permanent features and administration should be prepared for disaster management responses.
A bloated bureaucracy unable and incompetent to manage basic disaster management is an under statement. Preparing for such reoccurring known vulnerabilities is a rational policy decision. Why isn’t it done? The responsibility is with our elected members. They have not allocated sufficient ‘hardware or software’ towards disaster risk reduction at district and tehsil levels. The bureaucrats aren’t prepared enough with funds, equipment, manpower or systems.
Looking at the donor investments in DRM one would imagine Pakistani bureaucrats and systems should be adequately prepared, but they are not. Why is that the case? This is something monitoring and evaluation experts and oversight agencies should explore further.
When & if Local government becomes fully functional, empowered and trained will they be better prepared? One hope so. Will the members of parliament and the bureaucracies prioritize mitigation measures and adequately prepare for the annual disasters so that people do not suffer? I wonder if the candidates for the various local government elections have disaster management as a campaign issue? Perhaps constituents should ask them about their plans for disaster management for their neighborhood.
The cycle will continue unless citizens do not pressurize their elected members to invest adequately. The media also needs to raise the matter to demand what has GOP done since 2005 to better manage our annual natural disasters?

Monday, 20 July 2015

Eid Notes

Relief & Embarrassment. Looking at the Ruet e Hilal Committee
ramble on their television press conference, 10 minutes later announcing the ‘sighting’ of the moon and ‘formally’ declare Pakistan ‘can’ celebrate Eid 30 days of fasting later. Even the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia the bastion of all things awful considers it appropriate to rely on science to determine when the lunar calendar begins/wanes. There is no rational explanation why the politicians in the land of the pure consider it important to maintain this ‘committee’ of NONSENSE.
Chaand raat with friends reminds one of all the wonderful and warmth of Pakistan. There is no description that appropriately captures the feeling of the collective joy and reflection of a shared month of many emotions, from the jokes of those who didn’t fast to the nostalgia of those whose meditative state comes to an end. The rituals of churis/bangles, mehndi and gluttonous culinary delights cements what really is important and worthy of our cultural memories. I wish we had more of this. Its wonderful to see so many laugh, happy, joyous, optimistic and celebrating.
You blink and from looking forward to Eidi to making sure your Eidi envelopes are enough for all your nieces and nephews, how time flies. There is nothing more beautiful than the sight of your children in Eid clothes shy coy and with a mischievous smile looking forward to their Eidi. If they are anything like us, the competition of who gets the most Eidi from the most unexpected ‘uncle and aunty’ probably still thrives.
I am grateful we are safe and together as a family and a nation. Time to get back to work and wake up from the month’ slumber.
Eid ul Fitr is as close to the feeling I had at Christmas growing up. It is joyous and the sense of family, community and inclusiveness is palatable. I love it and I am grateful this year Pakistan had a peaceful and joyful one.
Eid Mubarak.

Violence

http://pakteahouse.net/2015/07/21/nilofers-corner-violence/

I hate violence. Lord since when have I started using language and tone which is violent to describe my aversion to violence? Something has happened in the past 10 years, to me, in Pakistan. There has been too much violence. This is from someone who is blessed and safe. And yet the environment of uncertainty constant violence physical and cultural is everywhere. Conversations justify violence. Actions ignore violence our conscience have become numb. Is this a self-preservation mode we have turned on? I don’t know is this an excuse to justify the growth and apathy by so many of the violence all around us?
So easily television anchors demand scream and write ‘hang this one kill this one eliminate that one’. Killing comes so easily. Where did the value of life disappear? Does any faith if that is the currency of value these days, not value life? Reality check. No one actually reads or is knowledge literate. Having so many souls in each family probably numbs one and valuing each and every precious soul becomes a challenge. Perhaps the justification of so many collateral fatalities.
Violence doesn’t only come physically here. ‘she is not like that’ what does that mean? ‘But you know they don’t believe in….’ I hate…’ where is all this going? Violence. Justified.
This isn’t the Pakistan I remember. Truly. Yes I don’t remember as a child what Zia ul Haq was doing to women, politicians, laws and culture.
My Pakistan was swimming in Islamabad club with friends after school. I didn’t know the answer of whether I was a Sunni or a Shia when asked by my Islamiat teacher. We walked or cycled to friend’s homes without a care in the world. There were no guards in any homes. MY only fear was please please I hope my sleepover friends haven’t chosen a horror movie. Hate them!

Atticus Fitich

http://pakteahouse.net/2015/07/21/nilofers-corner-atticus-fitch/

To Kill a Mocking Bird by Harper Lee without a doubt is a book that moved me along with millions across the globe and remains more than a book, the book was an experience, which had tremendous influence on how I looked at people, class, culture & history. Deeply moving. No matter how often I re read it, or watch Gregory Peck’s movie or see an adaptation Play it brings me to tears. Many books have, such as many other novels, Gorky Park (Martin Cruz Smith), Anna Karenina (Leo Tolstoy)
, War & Peace (Leo Tolstoy), A Hundred Years of Solitude (Gabriel Garcia Marquez), Love in the Time of Cholera (Marquez), 1984, (George Orwell), Lord of the Flies (William Golding) & I would include A Suitable Boy (Vickram Seth) to this list, these were more than just books, the stories & characters reached out and pulled me into their world, their mind, heart, pain and joy their experiences were real because they understood. Together we stood.
The recent controversial release of Harper Lee’s Go Set a Watchman is a travesty. Why? Because this book was a draft of the classic to Kill a Mocking Bird and should have remained as such. Harper Lee now over 90 years old probably is in no position (even if she wanted to) to challenge this violation. How many authors would like their drafts of their final published work to be shared with world? Furthermore having created characters, which have resonated across the world to flagrantly undermine that for what? Publicity? Money? Certainly not benefiting the author Lee, in her twilight years did she deserve this? Does she have any control over what her publishers and managers are doing to her legacy? Has anyone investigated who is benefiting from this stunt?
As far as I am concerned Harper Lee wanted Atticus Fitch to be as he is in To Kill a Mockingbird, if she wanted us to see him in any other light she would have published her draft –but she didn’t for whatever reason & that is how it should have remained. Literally.

Sunday, 19 July 2015

Which School Should my Child go to?

http://pakteahouse.net/2015/07/16/which-school-should-my-child-go-to/

Which Should My Child Go to School?

By Nilofer Qazi
school2
Met a friend the other day, while Discussing how to choose a play school for one's 2 year old, the conversation turned out to be quite existential in nature.
Which school should put one of those little ones is a very big deal; All parents will tell you this. What are some of the issues he considers to? The quality of the teachers is definitely a consideration, given that most teachers here are not professionally trained, meaning are not education degree professionals, that are primarily 'experienced' in managing children having Gained them are working knowledge over time 'on the job (s) '. Yes this is scary when one thinks about it, leaving it most precious, with untrained people who will shape the ideas and develop them to the foundations of their interests ... for life. Another consideration is the proximity to the more mundane no doubt that one's work is home for pick and drop of your child.
What I never imagined my friend but what I did was to admit feeling little one in Al Huda. Yes Farhat Hashmi's Al Hud. Can this be an Appropriate place for any child? Should not our children be taught freely and without prejudice & fear? Should their children develop solid foundations to begin the journey of life? Should it be focused on children at age 2 and religion prayer and ritual as the lens through which they view the wonder of the world. I did not realize I would know people who would even CONSIDER this as an option. I must admit I was aghast, perfectly well heeled, educated professional parents are putting their most precious in the hands of Farhat Hashmi.
Made me think. Given the environment we live in Pakistan, even the most religious would agree that we live in a highly intolerant and unsafe environment. Why would anyone (with a choice) to enroll their children in an environment where prejudice, ritual and gender inequality are innate to them the WorldView?
My one and only experience of Farhat Hashmi was in the late 90s where I saw all pre-adolescent girls bring to tears because they were not wearing hijab. My God Rehman and frankly no one would focus on such matters as the primary Rahim. Ethics are critical and essential in any society; ethics and values ​​of love, respect hard work not self-righteousness and clothing!
Farhat Hashmi is a controversial religious figure that has been in the press for all the wrong reasons, fraud in Canada and in North America with a very strict interpretation of Wahhabi Islam. Each focus has been to target the upper middle classes of Pakistan and the diaspora, and has now quite far and Widely spread all teaching throughout Pakistan. If we were to expect the next generation to be tolerant and inclusive of different people, views and religion she would not be the educationist to turn to.
I did not think any of "my kind of people's every establishment would even remotely consider them as an option to shape the child's worldview. But then some of the arguments my friend made: I did not want to feel the child to be brought up with upper middle class values ​​and did not want to feel the child to have materialistic values ​​he consider 'boys' as friends as "normal. Of course to each is their own value system. But since when is Farhat Hashmi middle class, in fact I understand each target audience is upper middle class (income wise); there is never an emphasis on giving back to the community or encouragement for charity work to improve health education in civic sense with the Al Hud groups. If we look just to the Gulf, follows the example Farhat Hashmi & apes, and their focus on materialism is unparralel.
Furthermor to, in my humble opinion I find the convoluted attitudes Enhances segregation between the Genders and does not 'protect' it girls or boys from deviant behavior. Making something 'unnatural' instills in deviant behavior. There is enough evidence all around. Why are he Malls trying to 'ban' the boys from entering certaine and stop making a nuisance of Themselves? Why do they make nuisances of Themselves? What kind of exposure do they have to different kinds of people and the opposite sex that makes them so socially deviant? Society can not impose unnatural behavioral patterns. The ethics taught at home is what guides us in our interaction at school, society and privately. Hijab does not make it to the pious far from it.
These conversations made me think hard, what are well heeled parents making choices for their little ones so early in life and how they will impact on their lives forever.